How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech Term Paper - 1

How might we (best) justify the immunity of vocabulary - Term Paper ExampleThis raises questions over the restraint of freedom of speech in protection beyond the minimal prescript of liberty. In my own opinion, there exists no single justification that would be sufficient to justify freedom of speech. In this regard, therefore, I would advocate for various justifications based on consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches. This paper seeks to illustrate various viewpoints to the justification of freedom of speech victimisation the communicative principle (Greenawalt 3-15).The philosophical position of a consequentialist approach contributes to desirable set of circumstances and relies on the association of facts between practice and the expected results of such practice. I take for with the suggestion that the freedom of speech promotes the discovery of truth as put forward by Stuart Mill. Individuals have the capacity to distinguish true ideas from deceitful ideas in reality in the presence of free speech. Thus, people would always demonstration careful spirit in settling for truth. In this case, any claims of value and an understanding by individuals of these claims of value constitute truth. In addition, any sensible idea and level of confidence would make individuals to identify truth and conditions that promote it. By contrast, enceinte states object the justification of truth discovery based on an assumption that truth does not exist. In their view, neither truth not its conditions could be place and if it does, freedom of speech would contradict the existence of various ideas in practicing the discovery of truth (Greenawalt 16-24).Freedom of speech significantly contributes to social stability and the accommodation of competing desires and interests. This unremarkably occurs during the process of learning where individuals discover other peoples desires. Accommodation in free speech creates a balance between conflicting interests using truth in resolving issues of concern such as capital punishment.